Truthful housing teams file federal lawsuit accusing Redfin of ‘redlining’ minority communities

Redfin sale sign
(Redfin Picture)

Seattle-based actual property tech firm Redfin is dealing with allegations of discriminatory pricing practices and “redlining” in a lawsuit filed by the Nationwide Truthful Housing Alliance (NFHA) and different truthful housing organizations.

The NFHA stated in a information launch that after a two-year investigation, it had decided that Redfin’s minimal dwelling value coverage discriminates towards sellers and consumers of houses in communities of colour in lots of metropolitan areas.

“Redlining, and the residential segregation it causes, represents America’s oldest racist and discriminatory real estate policy,” stated Lisa Rice, president and CEO of NFHA. “The fact that these actions are still occurring, let alone by a major corporation, demonstrates why we need strong civil rights protections now more than ever. Redfin’s policies redline communities of color and will further exacerbate the racial wealth and homeownership gaps.”

The lawsuit (at backside of story) was filed in United States District Courtroom in Seattle on Wednesday.

Redlining refers back to the presumed follow of mortgage lenders drawing crimson strains round parts of a map to point areas or neighborhoods through which they don’t wish to make loans.

NFHA, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit devoted to eliminating housing discrimination, filed the go well with with 9 of its member organizations after investigating the impact of Redfin’s coverage in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Kansas Metropolis, Lengthy Island, N.Y., Louisville, Kent., Memphis, Tenn., Milwaukee, Newark, N.J. and Philadelphia.

Within the criticism, the plaintiffs argue that Redfin insurance policies perpetuate “the stark patterns of housing segregation.”

Redfin redlines communities of colour on this digital age by setting minimal dwelling itemizing costs in every housing market on its web site below which it is not going to supply any actual property brokerage companies to consumers or sellers. These minimal value limits serve no authentic objective. Redfin’s guidelines assure that it’ll obtain a set minimal fee whatever the value of a house.

Whereas the precise minimal value varies from one metropolitan space to a different, between counties, and between cities inside counties, its influence is all the time the identical — consumers and sellers of houses in non-white areas are far much less more likely to be provided Redfin’s companies and reductions than consumers and sellers of houses in white areas.

Redfin’s insurance policies and practices function as a discriminatory stranglehold on communities of colour, typically the very communities which were battered by over a century of residential segregation, systemic racism, and disinvestment.

Redfin CEO Glenn Kelman responded Thursday in an electronic mail that was despatched to all workers and shared on the company’s website.

“Our long-term commitment is to serve every person seeking a home, in every community, profitably,” Kelman wrote. “The challenge is that we don’t know how to sell the lowest-priced homes while paying our agents and other staff a living wage, with health insurance and other benefits. This is why Redfin agents aren’t always in low-priced neighborhoods. It’s why Redfin doesn’t serve many rural towns.”

The plaintiffs are searching for a courtroom order ending Redfin’s minimal housing value coverage.

Kelman stated the go well with is improper in regards to the regulation however that the problems it raises are essential to Redfin.

“Certainly no one can complain that Redfin itself has been greedy about our income as a corporation when, in our sixteen years of being a brokerage, we’ve never made an annual profit,” he wrote.

Learn the criticism right here:

Redfin-Filed-Complaint.pdf by GeekWire

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *